Boards Results

NOOSA TEAMS CHAMPIONSHIP 2019 - MATCH 19

Board No: 26
Dealer: E, Vul: ALL, Room Datum: 30

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

11 WRIGHT Team 8 QUIGLEY Team 2 E 2D 9 140 -10 10

3 BENDT Team 16 OSMASTON Team 2 E 2D 8 110 -5 5

19 TALL Team 20 ADAMS Team 3NT S 8S 9 600 11 -11

20 ADAMS Team 19 TALL Team 3 E 2D 8 100 -11 11

1 KING Team 18 MCNAMEE Team 4 S AH 9 100 -5 5

18 MCNAMEE Team 1 KING Team 3 E 2D 8 100 5 -5

16 OSMASTON Team 3 BENDT Team 2 E 2D 7 100 5 -5

15 RICHARDS Team 4 HOWARD Team 3 E 2D 8 100 -5 5

14 GYDE Team 5 MOONEY Team 2 E 2D 7 100 0 0

13 LOVELL Team 6 SMITH Team 2 E 2D 7 100 5 -5

10 HERTELENDY Team 9 JAKES Team 4 S AH 9 100 -7 7

6 SMITH Team 13 LOVELL Team 3NT S 6D 8 100 -5 5

5 MOONEY Team 14 GYDE Team 3 W 3C 8 100 0 0

2 BECKETT Team 17 MAWSON Team 2 E 3H 7 100 11 -11

9 JAKES Team 10 HERTELENDY Team 3 W KC 7 200 7 -7

7 THOMAS Team 12 GREEN Team 3 N KS 7 200 3 -3

12 GREEN Team 7 THOMAS Team 3 N AS 6 300 -3 3

8 QUIGLEY Team 11 WRIGHT Team 4 E AD 7 300 10 -10

4 HOWARD Team 15 RICHARDS Team 3 W AD 6 300 5 -5

17 MAWSON Team 2 BECKETT Team 3 N AS 5 400 -11 11

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract Result Score Frequency
3NT by NS = 600 1
3 by EW -3 300 1
4 by EW -3 300 1
3 by EW -2 200 1
2 by EW -1 100 4
3 by EW -1 100 1
3 by EW -1 100 3
4 by NS -1 -100 2
3NT by NS -1 -100 1
2 by EW = -110 1
2 by EW +1 -140 1
3 by NS -2 -200 1
3 by NS -3 -300 1
3 by NS -4 -400 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
11 WRIGHT Team	8 QUIGLEY Team	2 E	2D	9		140	-10	10
3 BENDT Team	16 OSMASTON Team	2 E	2D	8		110	-5	5
19 TALL Team	20 ADAMS Team	3NT S	8S	9	600		11	-11
20 ADAMS Team	19 TALL Team	3 E	2D	8	100		-11	11
1 KING Team	18 MCNAMEE Team	4 S	AH	9		100	-5	5
18 MCNAMEE Team	1 KING Team	3 E	2D	8	100		5	-5
16 OSMASTON Team	3 BENDT Team	2 E	2D	7	100		5	-5
15 RICHARDS Team	4 HOWARD Team	3 E	2D	8	100		-5	5
14 GYDE Team	5 MOONEY Team	2 E	2D	7	100		0	0
13 LOVELL Team	6 SMITH Team	2 E	2D	7	100		5	-5
10 HERTELENDY Team	9 JAKES Team	4 S	AH	9		100	-7	7
6 SMITH Team	13 LOVELL Team	3NT S	6D	8		100	-5	5
5 MOONEY Team	14 GYDE Team	3 W	3C	8	100		0	0
2 BECKETT Team	17 MAWSON Team	2 E	3H	7	100		11	-11
9 JAKES Team	10 HERTELENDY Team	3 W	KC	7	200		7	-7
7 THOMAS Team	12 GREEN Team	3 N	KS	7		200	3	-3
12 GREEN Team	7 THOMAS Team	3 N	AS	6		300	-3	3
8 QUIGLEY Team	11 WRIGHT Team	4 E	AD	7	300		10	-10
4 HOWARD Team	15 RICHARDS Team	3 W	AD	6	300		5	-5
17 MAWSON Team	2 BECKETT Team	3 N	AS	5		400	-11	11

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 26
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
3NT by NS	=	600	1
3 by EW	-3	300	1
4 by EW	-3	300	1
3 by EW	-2	200	1
2 by EW	-1	100	4
3 by EW	-1	100	1
3 by EW	-1	100	3
4 by NS	-1	-100	2
3NT by NS	-1	-100	1
2 by EW	=	-110	1
2 by EW	+1	-140	1
3 by NS	-2	-200	1
3 by NS	-3	-300	1
3 by NS	-4	-400	1