Boards Results

NOOSA GNOT HEATS 2020 - MATCH 6

Board No: 22
Dealer: E, Vul: EW, Room Datum: -560

Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Alternative display format

Teams    Score Imps

North-South East-West Contract Lead Tricks   NS     EW      NS EW

1 RIDLEY Team 7 STAGG Team 4 E TH 11 650 -1 1

2 LAWS Team 5 HUGHES Team 4 E 5C 11 650 0 0

3 CROWLEY Team 9 BAYNES Team 4 E 2C 10 620 1 -1

4 HAWKINS Team 18 GIBBENS Team 5 E 5C 10 100 0 0

5 HUGHES Team 2 LAWS Team 4 W 3H 11 650 0 0

6 RYAN Team 12 PAULL Team 4 E TH 11 650 0 0

7 STAGG Team 1 RIDLEY Team 4 E 2C 10 620 1 -1

8 SCHWEGLER Team 14 DALZIELL Team 4 E 9S 11 650 1 -1

9 BAYNES Team 3 CROWLEY Team 4 E 5C 11 650 -1 1

10 QUIGLEY Team 15 HOWARD Team 4 E 7C 11 650 -13 13

11 POWER Team 16 FRENCH Team 4 E 2C 10 620 2 -2

12 PAULL Team 6 RYAN Team 4 E 2C 11 650 0 0

13 HERTELENDY Team 21 LOVELL Team 6 E 2C 11 100 13 -13

14 DALZIELL Team 8 SCHWEGLER Team 5 E 4H 12 680 -1 1

15 HOWARD Team 10 QUIGLEY Team 5 E 2C 10 100 13 -13

16 FRENCH Team 11 POWER Team 4 E TH 12 680 -2 2

17 CORDINER Team 19 SCOTT Team 4 E AD 11 650 -1 1

18 GIBBENS Team 4 HAWKINS Team 5 E 2C 10 100 0 0

19 SCOTT Team 17 CORDINER Team 4 E 2C 10 620 1 -1

20 SMITH Team 22 MOONEY Team 4 E 2C 10 620 1 -1

21 LOVELL Team 13 HERTELENDY Team 4 E 9S 11 650 -13 13

22 MOONEY Team 20 SMITH Team 4 W TC 11 650 -1 1

Click on the NS or EW Pair for a full display of that Pair's performance
Click on a column heading to change sort sequence of display.
If the play has been captured, click on the camera to see how the board was played at that table.
Go to Previous Board     Go to Next Board     Jump to

Cannot locate hand record file

Replay with Bridge Solver

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract Result Score Frequency
5 by EW -1 100 3
6 by EW -1 100 1
4 by EW = -620 5
4 by EW +1 -650 9
4 by EW +1 -650 2
5 by EW +1 -680 1
4 by EW +2 -680 1

     Return to this event's results
Alternative display format

Teams					Score		Imps
North-South	East-West	Contract	Lead	Tricks	NS	EW	NS	EW
1 RIDLEY Team	7 STAGG Team	4 E	TH	11		650	-1	1
2 LAWS Team	5 HUGHES Team	4 E	5C	11		650	0	0
3 CROWLEY Team	9 BAYNES Team	4 E	2C	10		620	1	-1
4 HAWKINS Team	18 GIBBENS Team	5 E	5C	10	100		0	0
5 HUGHES Team	2 LAWS Team	4 W	3H	11		650	0	0
6 RYAN Team	12 PAULL Team	4 E	TH	11		650	0	0
7 STAGG Team	1 RIDLEY Team	4 E	2C	10		620	1	-1
8 SCHWEGLER Team	14 DALZIELL Team	4 E	9S	11		650	1	-1
9 BAYNES Team	3 CROWLEY Team	4 E	5C	11		650	-1	1
10 QUIGLEY Team	15 HOWARD Team	4 E	7C	11		650	-13	13
11 POWER Team	16 FRENCH Team	4 E	2C	10		620	2	-2
12 PAULL Team	6 RYAN Team	4 E	2C	11		650	0	0
13 HERTELENDY Team	21 LOVELL Team	6 E	2C	11	100		13	-13
14 DALZIELL Team	8 SCHWEGLER Team	5 E	4H	12		680	-1	1
15 HOWARD Team	10 QUIGLEY Team	5 E	2C	10	100		13	-13
16 FRENCH Team	11 POWER Team	4 E	TH	12		680	-2	2
17 CORDINER Team	19 SCOTT Team	4 E	AD	11		650	-1	1
18 GIBBENS Team	4 HAWKINS Team	5 E	2C	10	100		0	0
19 SCOTT Team	17 CORDINER Team	4 E	2C	10		620	1	-1
20 SMITH Team	22 MOONEY Team	4 E	2C	10		620	1	-1
21 LOVELL Team	13 HERTELENDY Team	4 E	9S	11		650	-13	13
22 MOONEY Team	20 SMITH Team	4 W	TC	11		650	-1	1

FREQUENCIES FOR BOARD 22
Contract	Result	Score	Frequency
5 by EW	-1	100	3
6 by EW	-1	100	1
4 by EW	=	-620	5
4 by EW	+1	-650	9
4 by EW	+1	-650	2
5 by EW	+1	-680	1
4 by EW	+2	-680	1